0.04/0.09	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_6027 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.04/0.10	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 180
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:47:01 EDT 2023
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.40	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8XVAov3eYA/Vampire---4.8_6027
0.15/0.40	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# post_as_ho5 with pid 6205 completed with status 0
0.15/0.41	# Result found by post_as_ho5
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.15/0.41	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
0.15/0.41	# partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 91s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_bool_9 with 82s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# new_ho_10 with pid 6209 completed with status 9
0.15/0.41	# Starting sh5l with 76s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# new_bool_2 with pid 6213 completed with status 0
0.15/0.41	# Result found by new_bool_2
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMCSSN.
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.41	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
0.15/0.41	# Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-MSSFFFNN
0.15/0.41	# partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.15/0.41	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_ho_10 with 487s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 91s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_bool_1 with 82s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Starting new_bool_2 with 82s (1) cores
0.15/0.41	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.41	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# Proof found!
0.15/0.41	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.41	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_22, type, cG: $o > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_23, type, cF: $o > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_24, type, cP: ($o > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(decl_27, type, esk3_0: $o).
0.15/0.41	thf(cTHM627, conjecture, (((cP @ (^[X1:$o]:(((cG @ ((X1)))|(cF @ ((X1)))))))|(cP @ (^[X1:$o]:((~((cF @ ((X1))))|(cG @ ((X1))))))))<=((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8XVAov3eYA/Vampire---4.8_6027', cTHM627)).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))=>((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cG @ ((Z0)))|(cF @ ((Z0)))))))|(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM627])])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, (((cP @ cG)&(cP @ cF))&(~(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cG @ ((Z0)))|(cF @ ((Z0)))))))&~(cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (cP @ cG), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((cP @ (^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cG @ ((Z0)))|(cF @ ((Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (cP @ cF), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:((~((cF @ ((Z0))))|(cG @ ((Z0))))))!=(cG)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cG @ ((Z0)))|(cF @ ((Z0))))))!=(cG)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_4])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((^[Z0/* 9 */:$o]:(((cG @ ((Z0)))|(cF @ ((Z0))))))!=(cF)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((~((cF @ ((esk3_0))))|(cG @ ((esk3_0))))<~>(cG @ ((esk3_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_11, plain, (((cG @ ((esk1_0)))|(cF @ ((esk1_0))))<~>(cG @ ((esk1_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_12, plain, (((cG @ ((esk2_0)))|(cF @ ((esk2_0))))<~>(cF @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_13, plain, ~((cG @ ((esk3_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_14, plain, ~((cG @ ((esk1_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_15, plain, ~((cF @ ((esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_16, plain, ~((cF @ ((esk3_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]), c_0_13])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_17, plain, (cF @ ((esk1_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]), c_0_14])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_18, plain, (cG @ ((esk2_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]), c_0_15])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((esk1_0)<~>(esk3_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((esk1_0)<~>(esk2_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_17])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_21, plain, ((esk2_0)<~>(esk3_0)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_18])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_22, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk3_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((esk2_0)|(esk1_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((esk3_0)|(esk2_0)), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_25, plain, (~((esk1_0))|~((esk2_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_26, plain, (esk2_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_27, plain, (~((esk2_0))|~((esk3_0))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_28, plain, ~((esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_29, plain, ~((esk3_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_26])])).
0.15/0.41	thf(c_0_30, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]), c_0_28]), c_0_29]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.41	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.41	# Parsed axioms                        : 4
0.15/0.41	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
0.15/0.41	# Initial clauses                      : 4
0.15/0.41	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.15/0.41	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.15/0.41	# Processed clauses                    : 40
0.15/0.41	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.41	# ...subsumed                          : 4
0.15/0.41	# ...remaining for further processing  : 35
0.15/0.41	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.41	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.15/0.41	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.15/0.41	# Generated clauses                    : 35
0.15/0.41	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 37
0.15/0.41	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.41	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.15/0.41	# Paramodulations                      : 3
0.15/0.41	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.41	# NegExts                              : 4
0.15/0.41	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.41	# Total rewrite steps                  : 6
0.15/0.41	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.41	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.41	# Current number of processed clauses  : 17
0.15/0.41	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.15/0.41	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.41	#    Negative unit clauses             : 12
0.15/0.41	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.15/0.41	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
0.15/0.41	# ...number of literals in the above   : 6
0.15/0.41	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.41	# Current number of archived clauses   : 18
0.15/0.41	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
0.15/0.41	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
0.15/0.41	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.15/0.41	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
0.15/0.41	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.41	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.15/0.41	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.15/0.41	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.15/0.41	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.41	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1161
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.41	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.15/0.41	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.41	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.15/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
0.15/0.41	
0.15/0.41	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.41	# User time                : 0.014 s
0.15/0.41	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.15/0.41	# Total time               : 0.020 s
0.15/0.41	# Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
0.15/0.41	% E---3.1 exiting
0.15/0.41	EOF